Marchetti's APUSH: October 2014

Thursday, October 30, 2014

October 30

Hello ladies and gentlemen,

Today in class we took our Chapter 11 quiz and afterward passed back your outside essays and briefly reviewed the common items that you need to work on in order to improve. Primarily you all did much better with the basic formatting elements. I posted in the resources a Chicago style example paper (My Master's Research Paper) for those of you still having trouble and want to have a visual example of how to format everything.

After the quiz and essay review we worked on analyzing documents about Andrew Jackson. This activity is designed to practice document analysis for when we begin writing DBQs, which will be next unit. I won't see you all again until Monday, when we will have our Chapter 12 quiz.

Have a happy Halloween all of you who will be celebrating! Have a wonderful weekend!

Live long and prosper,

Mr. Marchetti

Wednesday, October 29, 2014

October 28

Hello ladies and gentlemen,

Today in class we finished our mock Senate Activity and debated issues of sectionalism. After we finished our mock Senate Activity we had a short lecture on Andrew Jackson's presidency. When we return on Thursday we will have our Chapter 11 quiz.

After the quiz on Thursday we will be taking a look at documents relating to Andrew Jackson's presidency.

I look forward to seeing you all on Thursday.

Live long and prosper,

Mr. Marchetti

Monday, October 27, 2014

October 27

Hello ladies and gentlemen,

So my kind heart has won out and I will be moving the Chapter 11 quiz from tomorrow to Thursday and the Chapter 12 quiz from Thursday to Monday. This means that the unit exam will be moved as well, most likely to Thursday, November 6. Make sure you spread the word!

Today in class, because of the shorter Monday schedule, we only had enough time to discuss the warm-up and take the chapter 10 quiz. Do not neglect the outside essay and vocabulary for this unit ladies and gentlemen. I am giving you a bit more time to work on them and should have your essays from last unit back to you by Thursday.

Keep on chugging along ladies and gentlemen. It will be tough, but all will be well.

Live long and prosper,

Mr. Marchetti

Thursday, October 23, 2014

October 23

Hello ladies and gentlemen,

Today in class we discussed the market revolution for our warm-up. We then took our chapter 9 quiz. After we finished reviewing the quiz answers I collected your political cartoon activities and then we began an in class simulation.

For our simulation you were split into three groups, representing 3 regions of the U.S. in the early 19th century. You will be debating and voting on bills in a mock senate tomorrow in class. Remember that tomorrow is a rally schedule!

The chapter 10 quiz will be moved to Monday to accomadate our simulation and the rally schedule.

It was great seeing you all today! I missed you this past Tuesday. I hope that you are all doing well.

Enjoy homecoming!

Live long and prosper,

Mr. Marchetti

Wednesday, October 22, 2014

October 21 & October 23

Hello ladies and gentlemen,

I missed you all yesterday (the 21st). I hope that you were able to complete your political cartoons with the class time available to you. I will be collecting those on Thursday when next I see you. We will also briefly talk about the different reform movements of the era.

Don't forget that tomorrow we have a chapter 9 quiz and then we will be participating in a mock senate activity/simulation in class. I really enjoy doing experiential activities so come prepared to practice your debate and compromise skills!

I look forward to seeing you all tomorrow (23rd).

Live long and prosper,
Mr. Marchetti

Thursday, October 16, 2014

October 16

Hello ladies and gentlemen,

Today in class we discussed the idea of republican values/virtues in early 19th century America and how it changed the way the family, society, religion, and economics of the time period. We also took the Chapter 8 quiz and the completed our Notes on the Presidency of Monroe and the era of good feelings. We also took a look at a creative activity where you will be choosing a reform movement from the early 19th century and creating a "pamphlet" advertisement for your movement. You will get time to work on this activity next week when I am away at my training.

Couple of reminders for next week ladies and gentlemen (it is homecoming week and so we are on a rally schedule):

Monday next week will be a Friday schedule (and Friday will be a Monday schedule), also I will be out for yet another training on Tuesday the 21st. Here are the schedule changes for the upcoming week.

Tuesday October 21 - I will be absent, you will have time to work on the Pamphlet activity.
Thursday October 23 - Chapter 9 quiz & sectionalism discussion/activity.
Friday October 24 - Chapter 10 quiz (recommend you not leave the chapter 10 notes to the night before or you will have a lot of work to do Thursday night!)

I hate that I must miss you on Tuesday, I would always rather be in class with you all ladies and gentlemen. Have a wonderful weekend!

Live long and prosper,

Mr. Marchetti

Wednesday, October 15, 2014

October 14

Hello ladies and gentlemen,

Today in class we took our Chapter 7 quiz. We then discussed the beginning of Unit 4, and began our 4th lecture on the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison. Tomorrow (Thursday) we will take another quiz (Chapter 8), finish talking about Jefferson & Madison, and then begin an activity looking at the social movements of the early 19th century.

This unit is a tough one! Keep on moving ladies and gentlemen, all will be well!

Live long and prosper,

Mr. Marchetti

Monday, October 13, 2014

October 13

Hello ladies and gentlemen,

Today in class you turned in your Unit Packet (including the vocabulary) and your outside unit 3 essay. You also wrote your in class essay for your unit 3 test! Whew! Lots going on here lately.

Don't forget that tomorrow is your Chapter 7 Quiz, and if you did not pick up a unit 4 assignment sheet in class today, make sure to check it out on the class resource page. Unit 4 is pretty heavy duty so we got lots of work to do!

Hope you all feel good about your essays. Have a great day!

Live long and prosper,

Mr. Marchetti

Sunday, October 12, 2014

Unit 4 and stuff

Hello ladies and gentlemen,

Just wanted to remind you all that the unit 3 test is on Monday (tomorrow). I will be collecting your unit pack, unit vocabulary, and unit 3 essay before we begin the exam.

Also I uploaded the unit 4 assignment sheet on the class drive page. I suggest checking it out as this is a pretty hefty unit and you want to make sure you are prepared! Don't forget that we have our Chapter 7 quiz on Tuesday as well.

I hope that you are all having a good weekend! I look forward to seeing you tomorrow!

Live long and prosper,

Mr. Marchetti

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

October 7

Hello ladies and gentlemen,

I hope that all of you are doing well this evening. Last time we met we investigated the United States Constitution and your group should have discussed the differences between the US government under the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution.

When we meet tomorrow we will begin by discussing these differences. After that we will talk about the first years of the United States under the Constitution and the establishment of political parties. I will also be giving you the potential Unit 3 essay prompts.

Don't forget that our Unit 3 Essay Test will be on Monday, and also the Unit 3 vocabulary and outside essay are due that day as well.

Hope you are all doing well!

Live long and prosper,

Mr. Marchetti

Monday, October 6, 2014

October 6

Hello ladies and gentlemen,

Today in class I returned your unit 2 essays and we discussed some of the areas of growth moving forward with your essays that are due for unit 3. I have shared today's PPT on the class drive page so you can review if you like. If you have any questions specific to your essay please feel free to come and talk with me during tutorial.

Tomorrow we will be completing the Articles of Confederation & Constitution group activity. Make sure you come ready to work!

It was nice seeing you all today after the long break!

Live long and prosper,

Mr. Marchetti

PS - The Unit 3 Test (and all the work that is due that day) is moved to Monday, October 13.

Tutorial Schedule

Outside Reading Project (1st Semester)

This is required for ALL students and must be turned in at ANY time prior to December 6. Below you will find the directions and resources to complete this assignment. It is worth 100 points.

Step 1: Choose a Historical Book (Non-fiction) and read a minimum of 100 pages from the text. This book must be on a topic from United States history in the years 1607 to 1899. You should pick a book from the list provided (see below), but may read another book as long as you get it approved by me (the teacher) ahead of time!

Outside Reading Book List

Step 2: After you have read at least 100 pages of your text, complete the Outside Reading Worksheet (see below). Make sure that your project is typed and turned in on or before December 6. Late assignments will NOT be accepted!

Outside Reading Project Worksheet

Submissions go to Google Classroom classroom.google.com

If there are any questions please feel free to email me, or ask me in class. DO NOT forget about this assignment!

Fun Stuff

Hey ladies and gentlemen,

I thought I would start a little list of fun things I wanted to share with you. Needless to say these are fun US History things!

First here is a podcast that is currently in production, examining each of the U.S. presidents in order (starting with Washington). The creator will be doing one president a week up to the presidential election in November!

Presidential

The next is for those of you who are interested in what is going on with the Supreme Court. This podcast follows the work of the Supreme Court and examines in depth the issues faced by the Court today. It is very good and informative!

Amicus

FIVE STEPS TO UNDERSTANDING THE 2008 FINANCIAL CRISIS

I found this on a review for a documentary about the 2008 Financial Crisis and thought it was a great summary of what happened. So I decided to share! Read if you are interested :-)

FIVE STEPS TO UNDERSTANDING THE 2008 FINANCIAL CRISIS

1) The Home Mortgage
It all starts with the venerable home mortgage. This is the most important piece of the puzzle. Think about how the traditional home loan works. You go to buy a house. You apply for a home loan at the local bank. The bank checks your credit. If you seem credit worthy the bank lends you the bulk of the money to buy the house. However, to insure that the bank doesn't risk suffering a loss it does three things: 1) it asks for a down payment. 2) It requires you to insure the house (fire insurance and what not). 3) the bank places a lien on the property, thus making the property act as collateral for the loan.

The down payment insures that there is equity in the home. Equity simply means the house is worth more than the amount owed. This is critical. The bank always needs to be in a position where the property is worth more than what it can be sold for. Ideally, a down payment needs to be sized such that there is sufficient equity to withstand minor fluctuations in the housing market. Positive equity, combined with homeowners insurance has for decades insured that the bank won't suffer a loss on money that is being lent.

2) Securitization
A properly structured home mortgage is a very safe investment, and thus a popular one for banks. The popularity, and sheer number, of mortgages made them attractive to a financial process referred to as "securitization". With securitization, large quantities of mortgages are purchased from the local banks by a financial services company. The loans are grouped together and then re-packaged into a variety of securities (investments) that are then resold to willing buyers. Think of securitization as you would processed foods. An organic vegetable garden in your backyard is analogous to the previously described traditional home loan. A garden produces pure and simple food. A home mortgage from the local bank is pure and simple. But if instead of consuming those vegetables, what if they were instead sold to a food conglomerate, which extracts a portion of the crop, adds some preservatives and cans the vegetables in various configurations and sizes (corn, peas, mixed vegetables, etc.)? That's equivalent to financial securitization. Home loans are processed into a variety of investment vehicles and made available to wide range of consumers.

By the way, although the umbrella term "securitization" is used to describe the aforementioned process, the term "derivative" is often used with regards to activities such as repackaging mortgages. The resulting security (investment) is *derived* from the original home loans in this case (there are many types of derivatives employed in the finance and investment world).

3) Deregulation
Securitization, in and of itself is not a bad thing. Fresh vegetables can potentially be processed in a manner that retains much of their flavor and nutritional value. For example, organic barley is grown in Oxnard, California and processed into a product called 'Barley Green'. This brings one of the best concentrated super-green foods to consumers who otherwise would not have access to such nutrition. Likewise, mortgages can be repackaged into safe investment vehicles available to those who otherwise could not participate in the mortgage market. But keeping securitized investments safe requires rules (regulations). There are two specific kind of rules (lack of rules, actually) that directly relate to the financial crisis in 2008.

First, in 1999 a very important law controlling the behavior of the financial services sector was repealed. It was the Banking Act of 1933, colloquially known as "Glass-Steagall", named after the two senators who proposed the law. Glass-Steagall was a very simple, 37 page law designed to help prevent another depression. It basically said: The bank cannot make risky investments with depositor's money.

[Some people will recall that in the 1980s the Savings and Loan industry was deregulated in a similar manner. In short order this led to the failure of hundreds of S&Ls.]

The second rule that was repealed was in fact never engaged. Congress tried to regulate the completely unregulated derivatives market. Recall that derivatives are tradable securities derived from real things (home mortgages, other types of secured loans, crops, etc.). In 2000 a movement was underway to regulate the trading of derivatives. Some law makers and people in key government positions fought against such regulation (probably the same people behind the repeal of Glass-Steagall), and Congress failed to pass any legislation on the matter.

So, going into the 2000s, banks now had the right to use customer deposits to engage in most any type of investment they wished, and this included derivatives. In the next section we will see how derivatives went wild, and how the whole securitization of home mortgages went very wrong.

4) Tail wags dog
So far we are talking about [safe] home loans being purchased en mass and repackaged for sale as collateralized (safe) investment vehicles. We also know that the derivatives being created in this process are unregulated, and we know that banks can use customer deposits to purchase these derivatives and resell them to their customers, but we don't yet know what deregulation shenanigans are about to occur.

The specific name given to securitized home loan derivatives is "collateralized debt obligation" or CDO. Don't get intimidated here. A collateralized debt obligation is simply a collection of mortgages! A mortgage is an *obligation* to pay a *debt*, with the *collateral* for the debt being the house and the property it is built on. Collateralized... Debt... Obligation. When you buy a CDO you are buying a portion of one or more home owner's mortgage.

CDOs became EXTREMELY POPULAR! Why? Because they were considered safe investments that produced a reasonable rate of return. CDOs came in many sizes to fit an array of portfolios, and, they were plentiful.

When a derivate of the nature of a CDO is offered for sale to certain market segments, such as retirement funds, the security must be rated by a third party as to its relative safety. Enter the Big Three rating agencies. Just as there are the Big Three credit reporting agencies, there are the Big Three companies that independently evaluate and rate securitized investments (Inside Job tells us the names). These agencies put their reputation on the line every time they rate a security. Many mortgage based CDOs received a rating of AAA, the highest possible investment grade rating. The venerable AAA rating is equivalent to a US Government Treasury Bill, which is considered the safest place in the world to put your money (the Federal government has never directly defaulted on a T-Bill).

As the popularity of the CDO industry grew, income of the ratings agencies skyrocketed because the agencies charge a fee to rate each CDO (nice work if you can get it). The CDO was a windfall for the Big Three credit rating agencies. Thanks to the CDO, mortgage backed securities were suddenly available to a wide array of investors. Institutional investors snapped them up. Demand became so high that there weren't enough home loans to produce the CDOs investors so coveted.

And this is where the trouble begins. Demand exceeded supply. This is where greed raises its ugly head and the slippery slope toward financial meltdown really began. This is where the tail started wagging the dog because loan demand began getting generated on the back end (the financial sector), not on the front end (a family seeking to buy a house). The quickest solution to create more CDOs was two-fold; a) make more home loans, and b) include other types of loans in the securitization process. Oh my. Yes, this is where the sub-prime loan comes in. Lowering lending standards was the quickest way to grow the number of mortgages that could then be re-processed into CDOs. It was easy for the loan originators (the banks that granted the loans) to grant sub-prime loans because they were selling the loans to the financial services industry for a fee, thus taking themselves out of the risk loop.

But that was not enough. The investment banks that created CDOs went a step further and started to include other types of loans in the CDOs; car loans, school loans, commercial loans, etc.

Oh my. So the logical question is: What happened to the ratings on these Frankenstein-esk CDOs? Sub-prime loans, by their very nature, are not the highest quality loans and thus do not deserve the highest quality ratings. The answer is the ratings agencies continued to issue AAA ratings for these CDOs. This is corruption, plain and simple. The ratings agencies were making money hand over fist rating these securities. They knew that if they kept issuing AAA ratings the investment banks would keep submitting freshly minted CDOs for rating. It's plain old greed and corruption folks, nothing complicated here. Inside Job shows clips of the heads of the companies testifying before Congress. It's laughable.

5) What's worse than a Frankenstein CDO? Leverage and Credit Default Swaps
At this point in time a lie is in effect. Institutional investors such as state pension funds, county retirement plans, and thousands of other entities seeking a safe place to grow their money are buying AAA derivatives that are in fact far riskier than they appear. The cancer of greed begins to spread further however. Large lending institutions that started to crowd out the proverbial local bank appeared on the scene. The biggest was Countrywide, issuing (as reported in Inside Job) a reported 97 billion dollars in home loans. This new breed of lenders invented additional ways to grow its profits. It lowered lending standards even further. It waved the down payment, relaxed income requirements, and failed to verify the income entered on loan applications... thus creating the liar loan. To add insult to injury the lenders also increased their profits by placing well qualified buyers into sub-prime loans, even if the buyer qualified for a lower interest loan. Sub-prime loans have a higher rate of interest and thus the lender's profits were higher. Is this not essentially stealing?

Bear in mind that the only thing that kept this scheme going was ever rising home prices. As long as the economy maintained enough jobs, as long as interest rates stayed low, this process continued. One side effect of the boom in easy home loans was a boom in demand for those loans, which produced the greatest ramp up in real estate prices in memory. Thus we have the "housing bubble".

But wait. The slippery slope of greed did not stop there. The engine that supplies mortgages to feed the CDO process was fueled further when the lenders and the investment banks started to BORROW MONEY to in-turn lend it out for more home mortgages. And where did a portion of those borrowed funds come from? From depositors accounts. Made possible by the repeal of a law that had kept the financial markets intact for decades since the Great Depression. Borrowing money to fund the granting of additional mortgages was a highly significant event for another reason as well. When you borrow money to make an investment (in this case to lend money to home buyers) you add "leverage".

Leverage was the straw that broke the back of the financial system in 2008, so it's helpful to understand how it works. Financial leverage works like any other form of leverage. A physical lever that you press down, say, one inch, might lift an object on the other end by 1 foot. Conversely, if you let up on that lever by, say, 1/2" the object lowers 6". Leverage works going up as well as coming down. The effect is multiplied in either direction.

In finance, if you have one million dollars to finance mortgages, and then borrow an additional million, you double your income. That's 2:1 leverage. All you have to do is pay a small loan payment once a month to service the loan on that second million dollars. If the income from securitizing the extra million dollars is greater than the interest rate on the loan, you're ahead. Inside Job asserts that investment banks leveraged as high as 33:1. This meant MASSIVE profits in the billions of dollars, but it also meant that the real estate market -which provided the collateral for these loans, had to keep rising, or at least tread water. If property values were to drop, the equity of the loan could become less than the amount owed. This is bad. It could in turn generate a margin call from the entity that lent you the million dollars, requiring you to come up with additional funds to make up for the loss. Also, if for some reason home owners started defaulting on their mortgages -say because they lost their jobs, or because the interest rate on their adjustable loan rose to fast- then you might not be able to even make the minimum payment on the money you borrowed, let alone pay back the principal. You would end up defaulting. It's like dominoes.

Now be sure to multiply all that by 33. With such extreme leverage, even if the homeowners kept up their payments, if the value of the home decreased by say, 25% in a caving real estate market you would still be on the hook for the full amount borrowed, and the losses could add up to more then the entire net worth of your bank. Whoops.

We know of course that the real estate market did indeed contract. But believe it or not, there is one more piece to this puzzle to cover first. And believe it or not, it is arguably the most insidious component of what lead to the collapse. Just to recap, we have safe AAA rated CDOs that have been Frankensteinized by folding in sub-prime and other lower rated loans. Borrowed money, including consumer bank deposits, has been used to make more CDOs. Now enters the "credit default swap", or CDS. This is another easy to explain term. A CDS is essentially an insurance policy on the default of a CDO. Recall that private investors and institutions were buying CDOs - which are just mortgage backed securities- for safety and income. The CDOs paid periodic dividends, and the capitol was returned to the investor when the CDO expired. The investment banks started to get worried about all those CDOs! They were so levered up that the slightest drop in real estate prices, or a rise in interest rates, or a contraction of the economy leading to increased unemployment... would lead to defaults on home mortgages, which in turn would lead to the failure of the CDO they were backing. So the banks took out insurance against this eventuality from yet another institution. They bought credit default swaps from insurance provider AIG (American International Group). With a CDS, the holder of the CDO paid a recurring fee to AIG. AIG in turn promised to make good on the CDO if goes bad (they swapped the risk to another party). What's not to love?

CDS insurance doesn't seem like too bad an idea until you start to see (as explained in Inside Job) that the investment banks were recommending supposedly safe CDOs to their clients while at the same time the banks were effectively betting the CDOs would fail by taking out credit default swaps with AIG. It should be underscored here that a CDS paid out to the INVESTMENT BANK in the event of a default... NOT to the customers buying the CDOs, not to the owners of the deposit accounts, and certainly NOT to the homeowners. Moreover, you didn't even have to own a CDO to buy a CDS for it! Meaning, anyone at all could take out an insurance policy against a CDO. Or multiple CDOs. There was no limit because THERE WAS NO REGULATION. AIG issued multitudes of CDSs. When the real estate market collapsed, AIG was on the hook for the full value of every single CDS taken out on each CDO! Huge-o leverage. This is where the government stepped in to bail out AIG and other institutions on the verge of bankruptcy.

Epilog
So add it up. Lack of regulation gives the nod to the financial services community to behave as they wish. Demand for safe mortgage backed securities in investment portfolios gives rise to relaxed lending standards (spawning the sub-prime loan, the no down payment loan, and the liar loan). The temptation to create more CDOs prompts the inclusion of non-AAA rated loans to the security and bribing the Big Three ratings agencies to rate all CDOs as AAA. The use of leverage multiplies the losses if the economy stumbles or interest rates rise. And finally the creation of a vehicles to insure against the failure of CDOs transfers so much risk to a single entity that it can not possibly pay out when the claims start rolling in. Most troubling is that politicians and holder of Federal Cabinet positions fought hard to make the system so vulnerable. And many of those people are still in office today.

Now you know why these instruments are termed `financial weapons of mass destruction'. Inside Job goes on to explain how very little has been done to address the underlying problem...

Marchetti's APUSH

Class Resources

Pages